Tuesday, September 16, 2014

One act changes everything

           I anticipated beginning Ian McEwan’s new novel, The Children Act, with some anxiety. I am a huge fan of much of McEwan’s work, especially Atonement and Saturday, both of which I’ve read twice, and some of his shorter novels, like Enduring Love.
            But some of his more recent novels have disappointed me: Sweet Tooth and On Chesil Beach didn’t seem worthy of his talent.
            So, the new book?
            Whew! Loud sigh of relief. Here is the McEwan I have admired, back in form, tackling an important social issue, rendering it compulsively readable through his inimitable style.
            The Children Act echoes a theme of Atonement and Saturday: one unintended act leads to a cascade of consequences, altering the lives of the players in a profound way. Like the protagonists in those earlier novels, Fiona Maye is a basically moral person; she is intelligent, well meaning, blessed with professional and creative gifts. As a British High Court judge overseeing complex family law cases, she dispenses judgment with care and compassion. Her peers admire her crisply written opinions, and she handles controversial cases with aplomb, not wavering in the face of pressure from the media or public. Her life seems perfectly orderly and serene.
            Except, except….An unexpected domestic crisis rattles her confidence and threatens to unravel her comfortable existence. At the same time, she is facing one of her most gut-wrenching cases ever: a dispute over the right of a young man to refuse a life-saving blood transfusion because of his deeply held faith as a Jehovah’s witness.  At 17, Adam Henry is not an adult, hence cannot legally choose to reject treatment. His case comes before the court, and Fiona must render a decision, keeping in mind the Children Act of 1989, which emphasizes the primacy of a child’s welfare. But what is in this child’s best interest? A chance of survival? Or honoring his religious beliefs?
Fiona visits Adam in hospital to try to gauge his true interests. What ensues affects both child and judge in unexpected ways. How their story plays out is a marvel of narrative suspense in a compact (221 pages) novel. The story is both expansive and compressed, as Fiona’s understanding of “the best interests of the child” changes over time.
McEwan has given us a gem of a tale, set in and among the venerable London Royal Courts of Law, and has given us an unforgettable character in Fiona—a judge and a woman who is, after all, only human.